Month: September 2022

Posted on

Top 4 Reasons Why Edward IV Marrying Elizabeth Woodville Was A Good Idea

Image Attribution: unknown scribe, Public domain [PD-US-expired], via Wikimedia Commons

Disclaimer: The content, images, materials, and information provided on this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. It should not be viewed as medical, financial, legal, or professional advice of any sort. We will do our best to confirm the accuracy of all information that appears on our website but cannot guarantee accuracy, reliability, or timeliness. All recommendations are made without guarantee or warranty. We make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

In a time when nobility, especially royalty, married for political power, lands, and money, a king marrying for love was both unheard of and unacceptable. But, to this day, most people believe that Edward IV married Elizabeth Woodville for love (or lust) and that this decision caused the War of the Roses to once again explode. According to some, the blood of thousands of English men coated Elizabeth Woodville’s hands and the blame was laid solely at her feet. But, did Edward choose to marry Elizabeth based completely on love or was there a political motivation behind this move? Was this marriage as much of a political clusterfuck as many want you to believe? 

As much as Edward was led around by his little brain (he was well known to be a horndog who slept with lots of women before and during his marriage to Elizabeth), he also was not stupid. Here are the top 4 reasons why Edward IV marrying Elizabeth Woodville was a good idea.

1. Elizabeth Woodville was English

Elizabeth was the first English born Queen since the Norman Conquest. Every Queen of England before her was a foreigner, which, depending on the queen, was a good or a bad thing. It was a good thing for Catherine of Valois while she was the Queen because her dowry was the French throne, but as Dowager Queen, it made her untrustworthy and stripped her of almost all of her power. The last Queen before Elizabeth, Margaret of Anjou, came with no dowry and, in fact, cost England much of their French lands. While she had her good moments, her favoritism of the Beauforts and the fact that she was on the losing side of the War of the Roses have made her one of the most reviled Queens in English history. Having another French Queen (which is what Warwick wanted) was very likely to blow up in Edward IV’s face, so it was no surprise that he went looking for an English Queen.

2. Elizabeth Woodvile Was a Lancaster

Elizabeth’s mother, Jacquetta of Luxembourg was Henry VI’s aunt by marriage and Margaret of Anjou’s cousin by marriage. She was an influential member of the Lancaster court. Due to her mother’s connections, Elizabeth’s first husband was a staunch Lancaster supporter and died during the first round of the War of the Roses. Her connections made her one of the more high ranking nobles on the Lancaster side left in England (aside from the Beauforts, who would have been more likely to kill Edward in his sleep than rule as Queen by his side).

England was still reeling from the Yorkist victory and Edward knew that his reign was on shaky ground. Taking a Lancaster bride, especially one whose mother had been as high ranking as Jacquetta, bridged some of the gaps between the Lancasters and the Yorkist supporters. At this point in his reign, Edward needed peace more than he needed the foreign lands, support, and funds that a French bride would have given him.

3. Elizabeth and Jacquetta Were Very Fertile

Fertility was always a concern for nobility but especially for Edward. The two kings before him had only had one child each and there were rumors that Henry VI’s only son was not actually his son. Not to mention, the direct Lancaster line essentially died out because out of Henry VI’s four sons, they produced only one grandson, Henry VI. The more children Edward had, the more secure his reign would be. Jacquetta had safely given birth to 14 children (that poor woman. Oh my God, no drugs or anything.) Elizabeth already had two sons of her own from her first marriage. There was little doubt that Elizabeth could and would provide Edward with the children that he would need.

4. Elizabeth Had Lots of Siblings that Edward Could Use for Political Gain

In an ideal world, Edward, at this point, would have only been Prince of Wales. His father, Richard, Duke of York, should have been made king upon winning the first part of the War of the Roses. It was only after his father’s brutal death and the desecration of his body that Edward took charge of the rebellion which led him to being crowned King. That made his relationships with his supporters complicated. Warwick took credit for putting him on the throne and since Edward was young, Warwick wanted him to essentially be his puppet. Cecily Neville, his mother, also wielded a significant amount of power. If Edward was ever going to stand on his own two feet as a king, he needed to get out from underneath their thumbs.

Since the Woodvilles held little power in the early days of the Yorkist regime, any and all of their eventual power was given to them by Edward and could be taken away at any point. Edward was able to marry Elizabeth’s siblings off to suit his political and financial needs, effectively taking power back from his over-reaching supporters, such as Warwick.

Here are 4 pretty significant political reasons why Edward IV married Elizabeth Woodville. Next time, I will outline 4 reasons why marrying Elizabeth was a bad political move.

Let me know what you all think! Do you agree or disagree with my arguments?F

Recommended Sources

Affiliate Link Disclaimer: The Snarky History Nerd Blog is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. This means that we get a commission if you decide to make a purchase through our links, at no cost to you.

Posted on

Alternative History: Should Elizabeth II Have Been Elizabeth III?

Anonymous Unknown author, Public domain [PD-US-expired] , via Wikimedia Commons

Disclaimer: The content, images, materials, and information provided on this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. It should not be viewed as medical, financial, legal, or professional advice of any sort. We will do our best to confirm the accuracy of all information that appears on our website but cannot guarantee accuracy, reliability, or timeliness. All recommendations are made without guarantee or warranty. We make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Due to recent events (as in the death of Queen Elizabeth II), I am going to swerve a little bit away from Elizabeth Woodville, back to her daughter, Elizabeth of York. As previously discussed in past blog posts (AKA Elizabeth of York: The KISS Edition and Did Elizabeth of York and Henry VII Have a Happy Marriage), many considered Elizabeth of York to be Edward IV’s heir, especially with the disappearance of the Princes of the Tower. However, she was relegated to the position of Queen Consort to Henry VII. So, here is the million-dollar question: should Elizabeth of York been the first Queen Elizabeth to rule in her own right, making the now late Queen Elizabeth II actually Elizabeth III?

In An Ideal World…

Yes. Elizabeth of York had the best claim to the throne. Full stop. Many of Henry VII’s supporters were actually Elizabeth of York’s supporters. It was his promise to marry Elizabeth of York that made him more eligible to the English throne than his own bloodline. 

Henry VII’s primary claim to the throne (despite being the nephew of Henry VI) was through his mother, Margaret Beaufort. Margaret Beaufort was the great-granddaughter of John of Gaunt, who was the son of Edward III and the father of Henry IV. She was descended from the side of the family that began as the illegitimate children of John of Gaunt and Kathryn Swynford who were then legitimized when John and Kathryn later married. By the end of the War of the Roses, despite being a woman (as everybody were sexist pigs back then) and a member of the Beaufort family, she had the most legitimate claim to the throne of the remaining Lancasters.

Two Potential Queens; One Throne

So pretty much, there were two women who had a claim to the throne (as Henry VII was basically Margaret’s proxy): Margaret Beaufort and Elizabeth of York. Out of the two of them, Elizabeth  of York had the better claim. How could she not? The last three kings were her father, her brother, and her uncle. Margaret, on the other hand, was only a distant relative to the last Lancaster king, Henry VI. Her own claim was tenuous at best, much less her sons.

Elizabeth of York Should Have Been Elizabeth I

Despite being a woman, Elizabeth of York had the best claim to the throne after the death of Richard III. Two of the last three kings were in her immediate family and the other was her uncle. Henry VII was only able to gather enough support to launch a realistic campaign for the throne by promising to marry her. Not to mention, Henry VII knew that she had a better claim so he delayed their marriage and even her coronation after their marriage in order to assert his dominance. She was allowed very little power because her mere presence in the political arena was dangerous for Henry VII’s reign.

In conclusion, Elizabeth of York should have been Elizabeth I, the first Queen of England to rule in her own right. That would have made the late Elizabeth II actually Elizabeth III.

SOURCES

Link Disclaimer: Some links within this website may lead to other sites that we believe may be useful or informative. The Snarky History Nerd Blog does not incorporate any materials appearing in such linked sites by reference. These links to third party sites or information are not intended as, and should not be interpreted by you as, constituting or implying our endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation of the third party information, products, or services found there. We do not maintain or control these sites and accordingly make no guarantee concerning the accuracy, reliability, or currency of the information found there.

Affiliate Link Disclaimer: The Snarky History Nerd Blog is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. This means that we get a commission if you decide to make a purchase through our links, at no cost to you.

AuthorSource Name
Alison WeirThe War of the Roses. 
Alison WeirElizabeth of York: A Tudor and Her World.
Dan JonesThe War of the Roses:
The Fall of the Plantagenets
and the Rise of the Tudors. 
Lisa HiltonQueens Consort:
England’s Medieval Queens
from Eleanor of Aquitaine to Elizabeth of York.
Sarah GristwoodBlood Sisters: The Women Behind the War of the Roses.
Roland HuiThe Turbulent Crown: The Story of the Tudor Queens.
Leanda de LisleTudor: Passion. Manipulation. Murder.
The Story of England’s Most Notorious Family.